01/25/2021 CCR Review Committee - Agenda

Committee members in attendance in bold

Former user (Deleted)

Corn, Michael (Deactivated)

Willis, Anitra

Brandon Salas

Brian Balderson

Claire

Daniel Quach

Hutches, David

Gabriel Knight

Jude Poole

Ken Wottge

Pegah Parsi

Phillip Lopo

rhassett

Richard Wagner (Deactivated)

Ryan Thomen

Tim Marconi

Former user (Deleted)

Todd Clopine Admin (Unlicensed)

Tom Guptill Russo

Winston Armstrong

Purpose

  • Review CCR submissions

Discussion items

TopicWhoNotes and actions
Intro remarksMike C., Sean O. and/or Daniel Q


Prior submission follow-upRick Wagner and Winston Armstrong

Padden Lab

PI = Carol Padden

Form and process, items of note and suggestions:

  •  Possibly add room for the lab to report on approximately how many other people and from what area (at a high level) that might be engaged with the lab and accessing data/systems from the lab.
  • Let's change wording around "Technical contact" to instead be "IT Contact" (lab teams may view the "technical" label as referring to "lab technical", not "IT technical").
  • Let's provide some check boxes around type of "backup" and include one that is "other".
  • Add "For the Review Committee" fields, as appropriate, where content can be inserted by the 2 reviewers, which can be for the Review Committee's eyes only.
  • Need a new FAQ item - Do ours apps pull protected data? No....
  • Around AD/login section - Add a pop-out box for submitter, referring them to to our login account guidelines section?
  • Login accounts - Add wording around how Macs are handled.
  • Apps and Web Services section - MFA - Should we flag for future follow-up?
  • Richard Wagner (Deactivated)  and Winston Armstrong should update.
  • Former user (Deleted) Put together an hour for team to revise the Kuali form a bit, to accommodate the suggestions above.
New submission(s)Daniel Q
None this time
Other?

None today