Committee members in attendance in bold
Former user (Deleted)
Corn, Michael (Deactivated)
Willis, Anitra
Brandon Salas
Brian Balderson
Claire
Daniel Quach
Hutches, David
Gabriel Knight
Jude Poole
Ken Wottge
Pegah Parsi
Phillip Lopo
rhassett
Richard Wagner (Deactivated)
Ryan Thomen
Tim Marconi
Former user (Deleted)
Todd Clopine Admin (Unlicensed)
Tom Guptill Russo
Winston Armstrong
Purpose
Discussion items
Topic | Who | Notes and actions |
---|
Intro remarks | Mike C., Sean O. and/or Daniel Q | |
Prior submission follow-up | Rick Wagner and Winston Armstrong | Padden Lab PI = Carol Padden Form and process, items of note and suggestions: - Possibly add room for the lab to report on approximately how many other people and from what area (at a high level) that might be engaged with the lab and accessing data/systems from the lab.
- Let's change wording around "Technical contact" to instead be "IT Contact" (lab teams may view the "technical" label as referring to "lab technical", not "IT technical").
- Let's provide some check boxes around type of "backup" and include one that is "other".
- Add "For the Review Committee" fields, as appropriate, where content can be inserted by the 2 reviewers, which can be for the Review Committee's eyes only.
- Need a new FAQ item - Do ours apps pull protected data? No....
- Around AD/login section - Add a pop-out box for submitter, referring them to to our login account guidelines section?
- Login accounts - Add wording around how Macs are handled.
- Apps and Web Services section - MFA - Should we flag for future follow-up?
- Richard Wagner (Deactivated) and Winston Armstrong should update.
- Former user (Deleted) Put together an hour for team to revise the Kuali form a bit, to accommodate the suggestions above.
|
New submission(s) | Daniel Q | None this time |
Other? |
| |