integration

• we don’t have visibility into issues and fixes

• lack of monitoring

  • currently, Judy does alerting which should not be the case

• expectations and requirements for quality and communication (i.e. Sean running loads)

• Should we treat external customers as MI?

• UCpath issue - sent data later than usual and larger size than expected (failed Monday 10/28)

  • who’s on point for monitoring and alerting? Process for follow-up?

TSS

• Invenio SOW?

  • Shayan and Kevin discussing IP

  • can we start in good faith in meantime?

  • still need detailed OTL

IR contract (MTC)

• fixed price bid

  • UCSD needs to provide back to MTC

Phase 3

• Can any tasks be started now?

  • check with Kenny if any of the BVs impacts the Nov app views that Sama’s working on

  •  

Validation phase 2

• BIA is validating CVs as they become available in DEV

  • helps with catching issues early so won’t be replicated elsewhere

  • less validation needed when we enter official QA phase

Outstanding OTLs for Erin

• Maximo in FACAH

• Jira in RAH

• possible joint budget ask from RMP and OCGA

• next fiscal yr - July 2025- July 2026

• Michael Weinfeld submitted a ticket for AP data (Academic Personnel)

  • not part of ESR

  • would need to be prioritized after TSS go live

• what happens if TSS go live slips? What are the backlogged projects' dependent on ?

  • need data steward to prioritize for each hub

• 3 yr need vs 1 yr

• contract employee (not PO)

  • would be a view developer / architect

  • Bhavya’s moving into BI role