Topics | 5/20/22 Notes/Decisions | 5/11 Notes/Decisions | 05/06 Notes/Decisions |
---|
Subcommittee Impacts: |
|
| Subcommittee 1: - no traction
- reminded the team that we were waiting on traction for subcommittees until we know that is what IPPS needs.
Decision: hold off on these until after June check-in / follow-up with Angela |
Surveys | - Send Angela the current survey draft to review prior to our meeting June 6th.
- Committee to review and finalize by EOD May 27th.
- Kelli to send to Angela May 30th
| EDI Closing Session
Aligning with Strategy 1-3 Trust
- 1:1 input on experience during IPPS >
- voluntary and additional data from "official interviews"
- Expectations:
- not an exit interview
- acknowledging concerns
- seeking recommendations / solutions for the benefit of IPPS
- Using as a test subject to see if this is viable option
- Official Closing Session on 05/27
- Include Students for these sessions
- ~10 students graduating = good source of data
- students interact daily with leadership
- Questions will be reworked for this demographic
- Virtual option available
- Schedule before June
- Include Temp Employees?
Confidentiality - leadership should NOT ask for names of those participating
- data provided to leadership would be high level topics and overall themes
- examples will NOT be provided
- protect employment opportunities
- Mandated Reporting
- disclose this at the beginning of the session
|
Defining Data: - Request some guidance for interpreting the data for Angela
- we need to decipher the definitions of "effectiveness" and "success"
- Edwina mentioned we will have more success with accomplishing goals if the data is coming from "Staff at Work" (SAW) survey
- Our survey are all about EDI vs SAW only has 7 EDI related questions
- need more EDI temperature
- need more demographics
- Goal: we want to bring IPPS in and see what is important to them, we can't get that data from SAW
- Timeline:
- Send email to Angela by Monday May 9th.
- Follow-up in early June on action items
- Finalize decision of Survey or Interviews to get voice of dept. by end of August
|
Performance Appraisals EDI Goals | - EDI Goals are for everyone in the organization
- Finalized Goals:
Required: - Complete the Implicit Bias training series (approx. 2 hours for all courses).
Optional: - Attend 2 campus diversity events
- Attend 1 IPPS Open Forum quarterly – feel free to suggest a topic/invite a speaker/recommend an article
- Join a campus group that supports diversity. See Staff Affiliate Groups (ucsd.edu) for ideas.
- If already involved in a campus or community group that supports diversity, host a Lunch and Learn to share info about the organization, its key objectives and events/how to get involved
Discussions/Impacts - How to weigh the S, A, E ratings for each goal?
- Taking training will establish baseline and won't be considered as an "E" in the PA review, but what should?
- Limitations:
- Scoring for EDI could be extremely subjective, especially if manager is not familiar with EDI concepts
- example: as a buyer onboarding 5 small business > should count as meeting EDI goals
- How will this training be enforced?
- Ted thinks we should make this an expectation and NOT a requirement
- Managers should be accountable for having conversations with team members and ensuring it's getting done in alignment with the PA review
- EDI Goals will be listed
- Proposed Solutions:
- request completion certificate
- employee to list next year in PA
- Committee will review and think on this for a minute.
|
EDI Goals / PA Questions: all employees Decisions: #1 > only requirement #2 > remove the awards/ luncheons from the options #3 > clarify if (4x) is once per quarter? 4 times per quarter? #4 > include other examples such as Black Staff Association (BSA), Chicanx/Latinx Staff Association (CLSA), see Staff Affiliate Groups (ucsd.edu) for more
Are these goals "check box"? YES, but let's be accountable for moving past the bare minimum. |
|
Side Projects |
|
| |
Walk-in Topics | - Nicknames in the workplace vs microaggressions
- Example of PI and Fund Manager
- PI calling Fund Manager A and not her name without notice
- Fund Manager confronted PI
- This is an example of aggression within campus and unspoken hierarchy
|
|
|
ACTION ITEMS | - Marielle G Vizcarra follow-up with Leah early next week!
- Patrick Etienne reach out to UC Learning to see if we can add it as required/get emails sent out to IPPS
- Committee to finalize survey questions for Angela by May 27th.
- Kelli email Angela with survey questions May 30th
| | |