Topics | 05/06 Notes/Decisions | 4/29 Notes/Decisions | 4/22 Notes/Decisions |
---|
Subcommittee Impacts: | Subcommittee 1:Â - no tractionÂ
- reminded the team that we were waiting on traction for subcommittees until we know that is what IPPS needs.Â
Decision:Â hold off on these until after June check-in / follow-up with Angela |
|
|
Surveys | Defining Data: - Request some guidance for interpreting the data for AngelaÂ
- we need to decipher the definitions of "effectiveness" and "success"Â
- Edwina mentioned we will have more success with accomplishing goals if the data is coming from "Staff at Work" (SAW) survey
- Our survey are all about EDI vs SAW only has 7 EDI related questions
- need more EDI temperature
- need more demographics
- Goal: we want to bring IPPS in and see what is important to them, we can't get that data from SAW
- Timeline:Â
- Send email to Angela by Monday May 9th.Â
- Follow-up in early June on action itemsÂ
- Finalize decision of Survey or Interviews to get voice of dept. by end of August
| IPPSTERS LEADERS - At this time we won't be moving forward with this survey due to small survey pool and risk of not allowing for anonymityÂ
- Can use questions as an activity during Leadership ForumÂ
- Active discussions and anonymous polls during ZoomÂ
| Kacy & Edwina conversation:Â - Meet with Angela group that writes customer satisfaction and staff at work.Â
- Come with questions that we have about data from staff at work and she can make recommendation on questions and dataÂ
- Goal is to have staff at work survey actionable. Our input can move that survey forward and be better
- Angela can give advise on what we want to get out of survey and if it would be best to do interviews or a forumÂ
- Kacy & Tony to draft email to Angela for introductions and gage interest and bandwidth for inputÂ
- Review Staff at work Survey to see what is missing and what we want to knowÂ
- Review Mary's survey response and Mary them to the Staff at Work SurveyÂ
|
Gathering Data |
| Staff at Work Survey 166 ppl within IPPS 40 folks are in LeadershipÂ
Lacking:Â - The changes graphics are misleading
- Blue area is VC office and not IPPS (which is what matters to us)Â
- Department Effectiveness > is this ranked / weighted towards the employee or the supervisor's success?Â
- looking at the plot where supervisors rank high and the dept employees low > how does this make sense??Â
- Survey is too long and may not allow for thoughtful responsesÂ
- folks do it for incentive, not really for true feedbackÂ
- Is not formatted to provide detailed feedbackÂ
Need:Â - direct answersÂ
- gave questions, but did not give actual answer scoreÂ
- True temperature of employee moral/ needsÂ
- separate from "success" and view what needs work
- need more data on staff demographicsÂ
- leadership
- team membersÂ
- satisfaction based on demographics
- how is that linked to "success"Â
| LEAD Fellow's Project - Scholarship is sponsored by the Chancellor OfficeÂ
- We are all in agreement that the funding of $150-500 is not worth the time crunchÂ
- Reassess next year for a project submission
|
Side Projects | |
| Meeting Scheduling - Keep EDI Meeting for Fridays
- Depending on frequency of Subcommittees we may switch to meeting once a month
|
|
|
| Open Forum - Kacy will email Tim, Robbie, and Ruben to see what day (Monday or Thursday) they would prefer
- Inclusive decision making and Logistics representationÂ
|
|
|
| Team Bonding - Assess meeting in person every once in a whileÂ
- Perhaps HH on TuesdaysÂ
|
ACTION ITEMSÂ | | - EDI Committee: Review survey questions and consolidate infoÂ
- EDI Committee: Review Staff at Work survey to see what we are missing and what we want to knowÂ
| |