Topics | 05/06 Notes/Decisions | 4/29 Notes/Decisions | 4/22 Notes/Decisions |
|---|
| Subcommittee Impacts: | Subcommittee 1: - no traction
- reminded the team that we were waiting on traction for subcommittees until we know that is what IPPS needs.
Decision: hold off on these until after June check-in / follow-up with Angela |
|
|
| Surveys | Defining Data: - Request some guidance for interpreting the data for Angela
- we need to decipher the definitions of "effectiveness" and "success"
- Edwina mentioned we will have more success with accomplishing goals if the data is coming from "Staff at Work" (SAW) survey
- Our survey are all about EDI vs SAW only has 7 EDI related questions
- need more EDI temperature
- need more demographics
- Goal: we want to bring IPPS in and see what is important to them, we can't get that data from SAW
- Timeline:
- Send email to Angela by Monday May 9th.
- Follow-up in early June on action items
- Finalize decision of Survey or Interviews to get voice of dept. by end of August
| IPPSTERS LEADERS - At this time we won't be moving forward with this survey due to small survey pool and risk of not allowing for anonymity
- Can use questions as an activity during Leadership Forum
- Active discussions and anonymous polls during Zoom
| Kacy & Edwina conversation: - Meet with Angela group that writes customer satisfaction and staff at work.
- Come with questions that we have about data from staff at work and she can make recommendation on questions and data
- Goal is to have staff at work survey actionable. Our input can move that survey forward and be better
- Angela can give advise on what we want to get out of survey and if it would be best to do interviews or a forum
- Kacy & Tony to draft email to Angela for introductions and gage interest and bandwidth for input
- Review Staff at work Survey to see what is missing and what we want to know
- Review Mary's survey response and Mary them to the Staff at Work Survey
|
| Gathering Data |
| Staff at Work Survey 166 ppl within IPPS 40 folks are in Leadership
Lacking: - The changes graphics are misleading
- Blue area is VC office and not IPPS (which is what matters to us)
- Department Effectiveness > is this ranked / weighted towards the employee or the supervisor's success?
- looking at the plot where supervisors rank high and the dept employees low > how does this make sense??
- Survey is too long and may not allow for thoughtful responses
- folks do it for incentive, not really for true feedback
- Is not formatted to provide detailed feedback
Need: - direct answers
- gave questions, but did not give actual answer score
- True temperature of employee moral/ needs
- separate from "success" and view what needs work
- need more data on staff demographics
- leadership
- team members
- satisfaction based on demographics
- how is that linked to "success"
| LEAD Fellow's Project - Scholarship is sponsored by the Chancellor Office
- We are all in agreement that the funding of $150-500 is not worth the time crunch
- Reassess next year for a project submission
|
| Side Projects | |
| Meeting Scheduling - Keep EDI Meeting for Fridays
- Depending on frequency of Subcommittees we may switch to meeting once a month
|
|
|
| Open Forum - Kacy will email Tim, Robbie, and Ruben to see what day (Monday or Thursday) they would prefer
- Inclusive decision making and Logistics representation
|
|
|
| Team Bonding - Assess meeting in person every once in a while
- Perhaps HH on Tuesdays
|
| ACTION ITEMS | | - EDI Committee: Review survey questions and consolidate info
- EDI Committee: Review Staff at Work survey to see what we are missing and what we want to know
| |