There is a shift happening with corporate EDI initiatives and in higher ed
HV had heard in January from a colleague at the University of Utah that EDI language is being pulled off of their job descriptions
Ted has been at a leadership conference, and their was an EDI session where some University declined to attend due to the climate on their campuses
Companies are pulling away from BLM support and are focusing more on i.e./ food insecurity, veterans, women in leadership
Wondering how this shift is going to impact us
Alma: Why the shift? Is it because it’s an election year?
Alma: What’s the temperature in the UC?
Maggie: The pushback has to do with seeing is as favoritism and seeing it as affirmative action issues. A feeling of over-support that does not sound fair
HV: Another place that this came up was during a Rady supply chain class and the professor of the class does a lot of work with DC and he was talking about getting sued because of the diversity requirements they had in their solicitations
Being seen as unfair treatment to others
Question asked: How are you not getting in trouble for requiring those things
At the system wide level, their is no requirement for diversity but there is one for sustainability
Maggie: VC Petitt’s thesis for her degree was about Janitors
Kelli: This topic will definitely affect our initiatives, are there any recommendations on what we should do in the mean time:
HV: pretty confident on UCSD staying EDI focused
Have not heard any rumblings on UCSD pulling back any programs
Will companies not want to bid on UC partnerships based on our stance regarding EDI.
UCSD crossed the threshold to be a HSI (Hispanic Serving Institution) campus